A few days ago, an Indianapolis-based freelance writer issued a post on her blog on the topic of ghostblogging. She refers to herself as a writer, ghost blogger and social media rock star. In her post, she defended the practice of ghostblogging and rejected claims that her work is unethical, inauthentic and outright lying.
I happen to agree with her and provided my two cents on the subject by commenting on her blog. Another local PR practitioner was so adamant that ghostblogging is equal to lying that she proceeded to blog about it herself and even issued a tweet that her post would render myself and this ghostblogger “speechless.” Hardly. The debate continued all day on Twitter with dozens jumping into the debate, some with humor, some with support of one side or the other, and some begging for the whole thing to stop.
The fact that there is a debate at all indicates to me that this is a gray area. It’s not as black and white as some would like to believe.
I conducted some research on the issue and rather than try to create some impassioned post myself, please see this post by Jason Falls: "The Ethics of Ghost Blogging." I agree with his thoughts on the subject 100%. I don’t think I can say it any better—especially the four bullet points at the end of his post. Another Indy-based blogger wrote an equally interesting post on the subject ("Making the Argument for Ghost Blogging. Yet Again.") that sums up my opinions on the subject well.
What do you think? And please consider, that the term "ghostblogger" isn’t the issue, the issue is writing on behalf of your clients and/or employer and the appropriate degree/relevance of disclosure that writing services were provided (at least that’s how I see it).



Recent Comments